본문 바로 가기

로고

국내 최대 기계 및 로봇 연구정보
통합검색 화살표
  • FlowVision
  • 물성치테이블

    물성치테이블 보기
    Category 공학
    제목 Test result (2)
    설명 Comparative Study of Ultimate Bond Strength Models for FRP-to-Steel Bonded Joints
    주석 d : Rectangular steel tubes were used in the tests. The thickness of the steel plate was taken as the equivalent
    thickness of the steel tube based on the principle of invariance of moment of inertia and the width of the section
    e : The elastic modulus of the steel plate was assumed to be 200 GPa
    f : Pu,exp refers to the experimental ultimate bond strength
    • * 각 cell를 mouse로 click하시면 해당 값의 위치를 더욱 명확하게 확인하실 수 있습니다.
    • Test result (2) 테이블
      Joint type No. Source Steel plate Pu,expf(kN)
      bs(mm) ts(mm) Es(GPa)
      Single lap join 1 Akbar (2011) and Akbar et al. (2010) 118 12 200e 102.9
        2   118 12 200e 154.8
        3   118 12 200e 73.5
        4   118 12 200e 100.5
        5 Biscaia et al. (2016) 150 114d 210 8.9
        6   150 114d 210 8.6
        7 Fawzia (2013) 25 10 200e 9.5
        8   25 10 200e 8.3
        9   25 10 200e 9.3
        10   25 10 200e 10.6
        11   25 10 200e 7.6
        12 He and Xian (2016) 100 70d 200e 46.1
        13   100 70d 200e 46.1
        14   100 70d 200e 46.9
        15   100 70d 200e 47.3
        16   100 70d 200e 62.4
        17   100 70d 200e 65.0
        18   100 70d 200e 60.7
        19   100 70d 200e 63.9
        20   100 70d 200e 41.1
        21   100 70d 200e 39.7
        22   100 70d 200e 46.4
        23   100 70d 200e 44.2
        24 "Lup??teanu et al. (2015, 2016)" 120 10 210 42.1
        25   120 10 210 38.3
        26   120 10 210 39.4
        27   120 10 210 37.9
        28   120 10 210 38.7
        29   120 10 210 34.9
        30   120 10 210 74.8
        31   120 10 210 78.8
        32   120 10 210 70.2
        33   120 10 210 61.3
        34   120 10 210 51.1
        35   120 10 210 46.6
        36   120 10 210 42.9
        37   120 10 210 80.8
        38   120 10 210 85.0
        39   120 10 210 56.9
        40   120 10 210 53.4
        41   120 10 210 32.1
        42   120 10 210 31.5
        43   120 10 210 54.1
        44   120 10 210 50.6
        45 Wang et al. (2016a) 138 20 198 40.3
        46   138 20 198 39.5
        47   138 20 198 42.3
        48   138 20 198 38.6
        49   138 20 198 42.7
        50   138 20 198 39.5
        51   138 20 198 41.7
        52   138 20 198 36.8
        53   138 20 198 37.6
        54   138 20 198 42.2
        55   138 20 198 39.5
        56   138 20 198 41.1
        57   138 20 198 42.2
        58   138 20 198 42.7
        59   138 20 198 36.4
        60   138 20 198 38.0
        61 Wang et al. (2016b) 138 20 198 112.0
        62   138 20 198 108.5
        63   138 20 198 109.2
        64   138 20 198 84.9
        65   138 20 198 86.4
        66   138 20 198 126.2
        67   138 20 198 123.8
        68 Xia and Teng (2005) 118 12 200e 60.5
        69   118 12 200e 61.7
        70   118 12 200e 55.6
        71   118 12 200e 50.7
        72   118 12 200e 53.2
        73   118 12 200e 39.4
        74   118 12 200e 42.4
        75   118 12 200e 38.8
        76   118 12 200e 47.5
        77   118 12 200e 55.9
        78   118 12 200e 38.0
        79   118 12 200e 46.8
        80   118 12 200e 46.4
        81 Fernando (2010) and Yu et al. (2012) 300 30 200e 30.8
        82   300 30 200e 31.2
        83   300 30 200e 67.8
        84   300 30 200e 62.5
        85   300 30 200e 112.9
        86   300 30 200e 113.8
        87   300 30 200e 106.4
        88   300 30 200e 113.6
        89   300 30 200e 35.2
        90   300 30 200e 40.0
        91   300 30 200e 33.8
        92   300 30 200e 107.2
        93   300 30 200e 109.2
        94   300 30 200e 46.9
        95   300 30 200e 63.8
        96   300 30 200e 130.5
        97   300 30 200e 84.8
        98 Lu et al. (2006) 60 3 189 19.1
        99   60 3 189 19.4
        100   60 3 189 19.6
        101   60 3 189 19.8
        102   60 3 189 16.0
        103   60 3 189 12.5
        104   60 3 189 27.8
        105   60 3 189 28.9
        106   60 3 189 23.5
      Double lap joint 107 "Al-Mosawe et al. (2015, 2016)" 40 10 203 108.0
        108   40 10 203 108.7
        109   40 10 203 109.1
        110   40 10 203 32.6
        111   40 10 203 30.4
        112   40 10 203 31.1
        113   40 10 203 33.5
        114   40 10 203 35.0
        115   40 10 203 32.0
        116   40 10 203 35.0
        117   40 10 203 108.3
        118   40 10 203 108.5
        119   40 10 203 109.2
        120   40 10 203 73.2
        121   40 10 203 73.1
        122   40 10 203 73.0
        123   40 10 203 73.2
        124   40 10 203 73.4
        125   40 10 203 73.3
        126   40 10 203 73.2
        127 "Al-Zubaidy et al. (2012, 2013)" 50 5 204 45.2
        128   50 5 204 44.1
        129   50 5 204 47.4
        130   50 5 204 46.2
        131   50 5 204 46.3
        132   50 5 204 48.2
        133   50 5 204 45.8
        134   50 5 204 46.7
        135   50 5 204 96.8
        136   50 5 204 101.4
        137   50 5 204 103.2
        138   50 5 204 97.4
        139   50 5 204 97.4
        140   50 5 204 99.2
        141 Bocciarelli et al. (2009) 30 10 210 51.0
        142   30 10 210 54.1
        143   30 10 210 53.8
        144 Bocciarelli et al. (2007) 60 6 210 117.6
        145   60 6 210 120.4
        146   30 10 210 52.5
        147   30 10 210 55.1
        148   60 10 210 102.2
        149   60 10 210 111.0
        150 Colombi and Poggi (2006) 60 6 210 104.9
        151 Fawzia et al. (2006) 50 5 195 81.3
        152 Fawzia et al. (2010) 50 6 200e 89.6
        153   50 6 200e 97.2
        154   50 6 200e 77.5
        155   50 6 200e 108.6
        156   50 6 200e 92.6
        157   50 6 200e 71.6
        158   50 6 200e 99.6
        159   50 6 200e 105.0
        160   50 6 200e 99.1
        161   50 6 200e 70.0
        162   50 6 200e 51.4
        163   50 6 200e 91.0
        164   50 6 200e 98.4
        165   50 6 200e 96.9
        166   50 6 200e 69.4
        167   50 6 200e 80.0
        168   50 6 200e 88.2
        169   50 6 200e 75.5
        170   50 6 200e 95.2
        171   50 6 200e 75.8
        172   50 6 200e 81.6
        173   50 6 200e 72.9
        174   50 10 200e 105.0
        175   50 10 200e 108.0
        176   50 10 200e 82.0
        177   50 10 200e 50.0
        178 Korayem et al. (2015) 50 10 200e 142.3
        179   50 10 200e 143.4
        180   50 10 200e 142.8
        181   50 10 200e 131.1
        182   50 10 200e 135.5
        183   50 10 200e 131.8
        184   50 10 200e 135.8
        185 Wu et al. (2012) 50 20 201 275.0
        186   50 20 201 267.3
        187   50 20 201 271.2
        188   50 20 201 151.3
        189   50 20 201 148.4
        190 Yang et al. (2017) 50 5 210 11.7
        191   50 5 210 13.2
        192 Chiew et al. (2011) and Yu (2008) 50 5 196 71.0
        193   50 5 196 73.4
        194   50 5 196 80.6
        195   50 5 196 89.7
        196   50 5 196 70.5
        197   50 5 196 88.6
        198   50 5 196 82.2
        199   50 5 196 82.8
    • 페이스북아이콘
    • 트위터 아이콘

    서브 사이드

    서브 우측상단1