본문 바로 가기

로고

국내 최대 기계 및 로봇 연구정보
통합검색 화살표
  • Objet500 Connex3 (3D프린터)
  • 기술보고서

    기술보고서 게시판 내용
    타이틀 Orion Landing Simulation Eight Soil Model Comparison
    저자 Mark, Stephen D.
    Keyword LANDING SIMULATION;; SOILS;; CREW EXPLORATION VEHICLE;; SPACECRAFT MODULES;; SIMULATION;; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;; ANGLES (GEOMETRY); ANGULAR DISTRIBUTION;; CENTER OF GRAVITY;; GANTRY CRANES;; SPACECRAFT PERFORMANCE;; KINETIC ENERGY;; AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE;;
    URL http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20090026521
    보고서번호 LF99-8510;; NASA/CR-2009-215757
    발행년도 2009
    출처 NTRS (NASA Technical Report Server)
    ABSTRACT LS-DYNA finite element simulations of a rigid Orion Crew Module (CM) were used to investigate the CM impact behavior on eight different soil models. Ten different landing conditions, characterized by the combination of CM vertical and horizontal velocity, hang angle, and roll angle were simulated on the eight different soils. The CM center of gravity accelerations, pitch angle, kinetic energy, and soil contact forces were the outputs of interest. The simulation results are presented, with comparisons of the CM behavior on the different soils. The soils analyzed in this study can be roughly categorized as soft, medium, or hard, according to the CM accelerations that occur when landing on them. The soft group is comprised of the Carson Sink Wet soil and the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Low Density Dry Sand. The medium group includes Carson Sink Dry, the KSC High Density In-Situ Moisture Sand and High Density Flooded Sand, and Cuddeback B. The hard soils are Cuddeback A and the Gantry Unwashed Sand. The softer soils were found to produce lower peak accelerations, have more stable pitch behavior, and to be less sensitive to the landing conditions. This investigation found that the Cuddeback A soil produced the highest peak accelerations and worst stability conditions, and that the best landing performance was achieved on the KSC Low Density Dry Sand.

    서브 사이드

    서브 우측상단1